Hi, Op donderdag 22 juli 2010 12:03 schreef Eric Kow: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:53:43 +0200, Petr Rockai wrote: > > Those are the issue 1599 fix by Adolfo that just landed in the patch > > tracker (and will need some review and probably at least one amendment > > iteration). > > Any reason that this urgently needs to go in? It seems it suffices to > be principled about the freeze here and wait for Darcs 2.6.
It is on the 2.5 milestone, so we could let it in even during the freeze (if the code looks a bit decent). How much real value does it add, as long as the dependent issues (1153, 1159, 1240 according to the issue tracker) aren't fixed? > > The other is the http packs stuff, which is partially in, but it's not > > in a good enough shape for release (due to --lazy breakage, etc.). > > We don't necessarily have to roll this back to exclude it. > > A simpler options might be to create a patch to just ignore the > pack fetching functionality. That's what we'll do then. Reinier
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
