Eric Kow <[email protected]> added the comment: On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 04:00:11 +0000, Jason Dagit wrote: > Would you be opposed to a repository created like this: > a) download linux kernel tarball > b) untar it > c) darcs init in kernel source > d) darcs add --recursive .
I would not be opposed (rather the contrary), but if it gets horrible in terms of hugeness, I'd like to see extra infrastructure (A) so that users can explicitly opt-in and (B) so that you can have per-repository sets of tests. I may be thinking about this is in the wrong terms by the way, but that's the current way I'd approach the problem. Also you'll want to be careful to stick to the same tarball so that we don't have a moving target. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, please try +44 (0)1273 64 2905. __________________________________ Darcs bug tracker <[email protected]> <http://bugs.darcs.net/patch318> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
