On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 02:55:02PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 04:14:28PM +0100, Eric Kow wrote: > > > - Large _darcs/pristine.hashed due to insufficient bucketing? > > On this, we are probably stuck due to backwards compatibility within hashed. > I'll see what can be done. Once again, we first need to clean up the code to > know better.
I think part of why I have not been able to migrate off of old-fashioned repositories is because of this. For me, there is no backwards compatibility issue because I hope to completely skip the first version of hashed (unless by some miracle it is made fast enough without this change). -kolibrie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
