On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 19:04:18 +0300, Dan Pascu wrote: > If get is supported, shouldn't then push/pull also be supported? > Otherwise interaction with the repo will not be possible past the > initial checkout.
The new Darcs would essentially be forcing you to upgrade to hashed. As Guillaume says, we could include Darcs 2.5 as part of our phase-out plan. As far as I can see, there may be a danger of repeating the bad experience of Darcs 2.0.0 (everybody is scared to upgrade), but maybe that's not so terrible? With few responses on this thread, I'm getting the impression that there is more enthusiasm about moving on, and few reservations about deprecating old-fashioned repositories than I'd anticipated. Is that really accurate? My inner hacker would be really enthusiastic about the advocated flame thrower approach to refactoring, but I'm trying to pretend to be a wizened old man and restrain him (well, Petr, who would actually wield such flame thrower with the community's blessing, but one can always flame throw vicariously). If the message really "let her rip!", it sounds a bit too good to be true. Is there something we've missed? -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or xmpp:[email protected] (Jabber or Google Talk only)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
