Ganesh Sittampalam <[email protected]> added the comment: This patch looks fine technically. I suggest we apply the first one immediately.
I'm a bit concerned about the option proliferation of --split-conflicts. I understand your use case, but I wonder if we wouldn't do better to improve our story around handling conflicts in the repo, rather than trying to make an ever more elaborate set of options for keeping patches in .dpatch files. I wonder if multi-head repos are the answer. On the other hand, perhaps local .dpatch files are the answer instead of having multi-head repos... ---------- nosy: +ganesh __________________________________ Darcs bug tracker <[email protected]> <http://bugs.darcs.net/patch445> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
