Le 14/11/2010 14:53, Ganesh Sittampalam a écrit : > > Ganesh Sittampalam <[email protected]> added the comment: > > This patch looks fine technically. I suggest we apply the first one > immediately. > > I'm a bit concerned about the option proliferation of --split-conflicts. > I understand your use case, but I wonder if we wouldn't do better to > improve our story around handling conflicts in the repo, rather than > trying to make an ever more elaborate set of options for keeping patches > in .dpatch files. > Ok, anyway it just occured to me that i can just fetch all patches at once, then use apply --skip-conflicts. So, please reject. I've also started a project of a darcslib-program to manage local dpatch files, which i can use to make up for that functionnality. More on that when I get to 0.0
> I wonder if multi-head repos are the answer. On the other hand, perhaps > local .dpatch files are the answer instead of having multi-head repos... > Yes, good question. If ever we get multi-head repos, we certainly want apply/send -o to become a way to switch between a head and a local .dpatch. Florent _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
