-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 It seems that a good part of the literate stuff in our lhs files is a) bitrotted b) redundant with at least some part of the wiki c) not directly related with the code it contains
I think these make the literate stuff a nuisance rather than an asset. Along with the code-code cleaning we have to do, would you agree with a migration of the manual onto the wiki and us getting rid of literate haskell. If darcsit supports locked pages, then the manual should be made of locked wiki pages, with open discussion pages for user questions. I think the parts of the literate stuff that deal with patch-theory (rather than the user-view of darcs) can be taken out now and put onto the wiki. Is it a problem if it's no longer in the manual? In a second time, we can deal with the user-interface part of the manual. Thoughts? Florent -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkzkD3MACgkQTCPcDztjGo55nQCgi7BjLvirklelhGnH8LrPb/bQ SMYAn0V9EAumU982y1TRwtOOrgkd5Ehv =9vd5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
