I'm for this proposal. Today I sent patches that modify small parts of the manual, probably that's what triggered Florent's mail. David Roundy's introduction acts as a tutorial, but we could just remove it and someday there will be a real tutorial or book about darcs, that will be up-to-date and *not* stored in the darcs darcs repo.
g. 2010/11/17 Ganesh Sittampalam <[email protected]>: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Florent Becker wrote: > >> It seems that a good part of the literate stuff in our lhs files is >> a) bitrotted >> b) redundant with at least some part of the wiki >> c) not directly related with the code it contains >> >> I think these make the literate stuff a nuisance rather than an asset. >> Along with the code-code cleaning we have to do, would you agree with a >> migration of the manual onto the wiki and us getting rid of literate >> haskell. > > I'm all for this. But I have a bunch of patches almost ready to submit that > refactor quite a bit of patch code, in which I very carefully pull the > literate stuff along with the changes, and I'd rather not have to redo them. > (In retrospect, I should have proposed this myself when I started!) So I'd > like to delay this until after that goes in, assuming it is accepted. > > Ganesh > _______________________________________________ > darcs-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users > _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
