Eric Kow wrote: > Sorry if I got carried away. Same here ;-)
> My attitude with UI feedback is to avoid effectively asking our users to > design the UI for us. It's not about ?do you like it better if we do X or > Y?? Well, I am probably not representative for the majority of users, but FWIW one of the things I value in a UI (especially a command line UI) is consistency. Darcs is certainly better in this regard than many other command line tools, but there are some rough edges that could (w/o much effort, I think) be smoothed. My message here http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2012-August/026593.html outlines a few. As I write this, another one comes to my mind, namely the extra 'enter' I have to hit after darcs asks for confirmation (for e.g. revert) ... but I see now that this has been fixed in the screened repo. Cool. Apropos screened repo: a while ago I sent a patch to Setup.hs that fixes the build for people who have made --interactive their default for 'darcs changes'. Since the change is trivial and cannot break anything, I thought it was a no-brainer and would go through screening w/o any further ado, but I never received a reply nor can I see it in screened. Cheers -- Ben Franksen () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
