On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Šarūnas Burdulis <saru...@mail.saabnet.com> wrote: > would someone care to take a look at the attached patch? It ads > $(EXIF_MODEL) to recognized variables in the export to files on disk > file naming field. I used darktable-org/darktable master branch to start > with.
Is exif_model actually what you want? Here's what's in the img struct: exif_make: the camera make exactly as reported in EXIF (cameras from the same manufacturer will have slightly different values) exif_model: the model exactly as reported in EXIF (often the maker is also in the model) camera_make: the camera make cleaned up (no needlessly long names, all cameras will report the same) camera_model: the camera model cleaned up (no needlessly long names, if there are aliases the base name is used so "EOS REBEL SL1" becomes "EOS 100D") camera_alias: same as before but the alias is used (so "EOS REBEL SL1" stays that way) Depending on what you want to do some are better than others. I suspect camera_make and camera_alias are actually better for most purposes and is what we show in the interface. Cheers, Pedro ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
