On 11/20/2015 04:33 PM, Pedro Côrte-Real wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Šarūnas Burdulis
> <saru...@mail.saabnet.com> wrote:
>> would someone care to take a look at the attached patch? It ads
>> $(EXIF_MODEL) to recognized variables in the export to files on disk
>> file naming field. I used darktable-org/darktable master branch to start
>> with.
> 
> Is exif_model actually what you want? Here's what's in the img struct:
> 
> exif_make: the camera make exactly as reported in EXIF (cameras from
> the same manufacturer will have slightly different values)
> exif_model: the model exactly as reported in EXIF (often the maker is
> also in the model)
> camera_make: the camera make cleaned up (no needlessly long names, all
> cameras will report the same)
> camera_model: the camera model cleaned up (no needlessly long names,
> if there are aliases the base name is used so "EOS REBEL SL1" becomes
> "EOS 100D")
> camera_alias: same as before but the alias is used (so "EOS REBEL SL1"
> stays that way)
> [...]

I just made a pull request on GitHub to add MAKER and MODEL using
img->camera_maker and img->camera_model. It's a minor patch.

Thanks for considering it.

-- 
Šarūnas Burdulis
http://math.dartmouth.edu/~sarunas
___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org

Reply via email to