Don't have much experience with styles so that point eluded me. Then it makes sense to have a checkbox to in/exclude the "off" modules.
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 9:21 AM <dt-l...@stefan-klinger.de> wrote: > Julian Rickards (2019-Jun-10, excerpt): > > I have always wondered why "off" modules were included in the compressed > > history stack so I'm in favour of having them removed. When you compress > > the history stack, you lose the details of the history that took you to > the > > final stage so losing the "off" modules should be a no-brainer. > > I guess (!) one reason to keep them is in order to build styles, > which, when applied to an image (i.e., appended to an existing stack), > have the ability to switch off previously enabled modules. > > > -- > http://stefan-klinger.de o/X > I prefer receiving plain text messages, not exceeding 32kB. /\/ > \ > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
