Hi all (and hi Pascal) I have a little concern about the actual lightroom implementation in the code. The context : As some of you know, I'm currently working on mask implementation. This implies some changes to spot removal iop, as it will reuse the forms used by masks. So I have updated spot removal version module (1=>2) with legacy_params etc... But after my last merge of master (my first merge with Pascal's work) I've discovered that now I have to upgrade the lightroom code too. In this case, this is not a big deal : I can change lightroom code to be compliant with my spots(2), but I think that this break the code splitting between iop and the rest of dt... If tomorrow, we want to ship iop separately (or at least let the user install external iop), this can be a big problem, imho.
Sadly I have no idea how to avoid this (my coding are too poor, sorry) Aldric ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS, MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts. SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122412 _______________________________________________ darktable-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-devel
