* I. Ivanov <iv3...@gmail.com> [12-30-16 20:15]: > Since as per the man pages the library can be on a different location - > would it make more sense for a person who uses NAS for pictures and more > than one computers to work on the images to simply put the library on the > NAS? > > Then each computer can access the same library (perhaps not > "simultaneously"). > > Regards, > > B > > > On 2016-12-30 10:04 AM, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > > Am Freitag, 30. Dezember 2016, 11:57:13 CET schrieb Patrick Shanahan: > > > * Tobias Ellinghaus <m...@houz.org> [12-30-16 10:49]: > > > > Am Freitag, 30. Dezember 2016, 16:15:05 CET schrieb Torsten Bronger: > > > > > Hallöchen! > > > > > > > > > > Robert Krawitz writes: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like a setting -- not simply a command line option -- to skip > > > > > > the database altogether and just use sidecar files. I didn't find > > > > > > any such setting in the current git master. > > > > > Indeed, although I can easily live with its behaviour since > > > > > re-reading updated XMP files was added to DT. > > > > Set database=:memory: in ~/.config/darktable/darktablerc. > > > does that affect data.db (tags)? > > No. data.db is part of dt's settings, so that is only changeable together > > with > > the configdir. > > > > Tobias
That would work if the NAS *always* was the same path. -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA @ptilopteri http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member facebook/ptilopteri Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 Registered Linux User #207535 Photos: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/piwigo @ http://linuxcounter.net ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
