I took another shot at the image with better results this time https://www.dropbox.com/s/4fihvmxi0ct9jt6/orf.jpg?dl=0
Sidecar is attached. Bill On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Peter Cripps <pe...@petercripps.com> wrote: > > > On 04/09/2018 10:28 AM, Timur Irikovich Davletshin wrote: > >> >> Well, did they look the same before reducing exposure? I wonder if >> basecurve is the same in both cases (two options are available in DT). >> Looks like LR does some sort of highlight reconstruction by default, if >> you enable LCh reconstruction in DT you will get same amount of details >> but different color cast... >> ____________________________________________________________ >> ________________ >> >> > Here's what they looked like before the exposure corrections: > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/dj5u2bw2l59z5rs/darktable_before.jpg?dl=0 > (darktable no exposure adjustment) > https://www.dropbox.com/s/y9bcewm1lw2poxj/Lightroom_before.jpg?dl=0 > (Lightroom no exposure adjustment) > > Again, dt seems to be missing content at the high intensity end of the > histogram. > > Regarding base curves, etc., here's what dt looks like before all the > default processes are applied: > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/cuznj09n9f1li8y/darktable_start.jpg?dl=0 > (darktable no baseline) > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > ________________ > darktable user mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscribe@lis > ts.darktable.org > > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
Y5050211.ORF.xmp
Description: Binary data
