i do that too.. i thought about it more like storing a separate history with the snapshot, so you can go back to it, if you explicitly ask for it (via a new button, not if you just click the snapshot).
but even with that button in place i can see how users will destroy their history stack with it by accident, so your point still stands. -jo On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Richard Levitte <[email protected]> wrote: > Not to be contrary, but I'd hate it if snapshots became history > entries. The reason is simple, I don't always think of taking a > snapshot at the right moment, my solution has been to click on the > history line that I want to have a snapshot of (effectively going back > in history), taking the snap, then click on the top of history > (effectively coming back to the present). > > You can probably figure how pleased I would be if the above suddenly > destroyed a whole stack of history ;-) > > Cheers, > Richard > > In message <[email protected]> on Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:52:59 +0100, > Ivan Tarozzi <[email protected]> said: > > itarozzi> Hi all :) > itarozzi> I have a doubt about snapshot and history stack; I think it would be > itarozzi> better to add a new stack step when a snapshot is taken. > itarozzi> > itarozzi> Use case: > itarozzi> I use a plugin but I'm not sure how to obtain the best result. Ok, > I set > itarozzi> some plugin options -> here a history stack step is added. > itarozzi> Then I take a snapshot. > itarozzi> Then I move some plugin options to see how to obtain better result > -> > itarozzi> the last history stack option is updated > itarozzi> > itarozzi> I can use snapshot view to see differences between snapshot and > last > itarozzi> step, but I can't reset to my first plugin setting. > itarozzi> > itarozzi> My workaround, now, is to enable/disable another plugin to generate > an > itarozzi> intermediate step, the move again plugin options obtaining the > itarozzi> possibility to switch between 2 or more versions. > itarozzi> > itarozzi> Imo when take a snapshot it would make sense add a new step. > itarozzi> What about your experiences about this use case? > itarozzi> > itarozzi> Ivan > itarozzi> PS > itarozzi> if you think it would be useful, I can try to patch this feature > itarozzi> > itarozzi> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > itarozzi> Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a > single > itarozzi> web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, > vmware, > itarozzi> SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. > itarozzi> Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! > itarozzi> http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov > itarozzi> _______________________________________________ > itarozzi> Darktable-users mailing list > itarozzi> [email protected] > itarozzi> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single > web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, > SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. > Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov > _______________________________________________ > Darktable-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
