On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Pascal de Bruijn <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
> All RAW converters use fundamentally different ways to process the
> image data (including basic RAW tonality/color interpretation, so
> "edits" simply don't transfer 1:1. So getting near pixel perfect
> imports is pretty much infeasible. Working up code to get even
> ballpark matches for most images is a boatload of work.
>
> The recommended approach would be the export all of your edits from
> Aperture to high quality JPEGs, and keep those around. After importing
> your RAWs into Darktable, and you want to edit an image you've
> previously processed, you can either do any edits off of the Aperture
> exported JPEG, _OR_ re-do all the work on the RAW in Darktable using
> the exported JPEG as a reference.
>
> Regards,
> Pascal de Bruijn
>
Hi Pascal,
Thanks for the confirmation - I figured that this would be impossible to
get exactly right, but hoped there might be a way to get 'close enough'...
Bringing over jpg/png/tiff images and the raw data makes sense...
Warren
--
Warren Baird - Photographer and Digital Artist
http://www.synergisticimages.ca
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC, Windows 8 Apps, JavaScript and much more. Keep your skills current
with LearnDevNow - 3,200 step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft
MVPs and experts. ON SALE this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
