I already have most of it complete from pre-darktable days, it would just
need a tweak or another to accommodate the export methods. I'll get onto
IRC tonight if I can.
John P Santos
Digital Media Consultant - Green Bee Media
greenbeemedia.ca
On 2013-02-25 2:07 PM, "jeremy rosen" <jeremy.ro...@enst-bretagne.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 7:21 PM, John P Santos
> <jpsan...@greenbeemedia.ca> wrote:
> > Jeremy,
> >
> >> also note that we don't want to add more external dependencies to
> >> darktable, so if you can generate that simply it's fine, but take this
> >> into account... I don't know enough about web technology to assess
> >> that, though
> >
> >
> > Ahh, I'm a web developer besides being a photographer. I can confidently
> > say that we could add a fancier gallery without creating code
> dependencies,
> > at least nothing for the compilation of darktable itself, eg, external
> > libraries. That said however, the code could be made to be very
> flexible,
> > if I am going to do this, I would love to have in my resumé that I
> > contribute to Darktable as a project, so I would be happy to update this
> > aspect of the project on an on-going basis.
> >
>
> not a problem, I know for a fact that my open-source contributions did
> land me my current job :P
>
> I think you need to come and discuss on irc (freenode, channel
> #darktable) I can only speak generalities and we are quite a bunch of
> devs that don't always agree on that sort of aspects... So it's best
> to discuss your plans before starting to implement (prototyping and
> studying technologies is a good idea, but don't go to far and be ready
> to drop what you did, that's the open source way)
>
> > Perhaps this can be a "fancier" gallery export option. Is the code
> that's
> > generated currently done within DT, or are there some template files that
> > are being used?
> >
>
> I nvere studied that code, so your guess is as good as mine. It is
> located in src/imageio/storage/gallery.c and seems mainly to be using
> .css and .js files that are located in data/js and data/style
>
> so tweaking it should be failry easy
>
> >>
> >> thumbnails (i.e exporting images twice) shouldn't be a problem, that's
> >> something we can do in DT
> >
> >
> > Could that be done automatically within the module itself? Export based
> on
> > the size parameters defined, and then a "thumbnail-size" built into the
> > module?
>
> I would have to look at the details but it's probably doable. maybe
> some rework of how outputs are processed would be needed but overall
> it should be doable.
>
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > John P Santos
> > Digital Media Consultant
> > Green Bee Media
> > greenbeemedia.com
> > facebook.com/greenbeemedia.ca
> > twitter.com/greenbeemedia
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:18 AM, jeremy rosen
> > <jeremy.ro...@enst-bretagne.fr> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I do. :) Usually I just export to jpg and then I have a php script
> >> > which
> >> > I dump into the folder and it does all the magic, reads meta
> >> > information,
> >> > tags. I also have a script which generates thumbnails because not all
> >> > hosting services appreciate the amount of RAM it can take to generate
> >> > thumbnails.
> >> >
> >> yes, that's how we expect people to work with web gallery...
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> however this statements has two "workarounds"
> >> >>
> >> >> * we are ready to take improvements to our existing gallery as
> >> >> patches. We have no web developement experts in the team and changes
> >> >> that respect the above philosophy could get in. Be sure to discuss
> >> >> those changes here or on IRC before investing too much time into them
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > That sounds great. I wouldn't mind using my design skills to
> >> > contribute.
> >> > I'll get into the IRC channel, I'll have to look up where to go I
> guess
> >> > on
> >> > your site. My suggestion would be a bit of PHP, HTML5, CSS3 & jQuery.
> >> > A
> >> > lightbox would be ideal, clean, simple, and it looks amazing.
> However,
> >> > thumbnails for gallery views are necessary.
> >> >
> >>
> >> also note that we don't want to add more external dependencies to
> >> darktable, so if you can generate that simply it's fine, but take this
> >> into account... I don't know enough about web technology to assess
> >> that, though
> >>
> >> thumbnails (i.e exporting images twice) shouldn't be a problem, that's
> >> something we can do in DT
> >
> >
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
Darktable-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
