On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]> wrote:
> * johannes hanika <[email protected]> [07-23-13 04:13]:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> [...]
> > > It works for you with a *single* image displayed in lightroom?
> > >
> > > ie: with a single image displayed I select that image, <ctrl><a> to
> > > select all, and <ctrl><e> to export *all* images. But I only get one
> > > image exported.
> > >
> > > Is this the intended action?
> > >
> > > note: if more than *one* image is displayed in lightroom view, all
> > > *selected* images are exported. Doesn't seem correct to me and wasn't
> how
> > > it worked 4 days ago.
> > >
> >
> > selection behaviour changed a little in that respect. it seemed counter
> > intuitive that actions would work on the whole set of images, even though
> > you're only looking at one (1 image/row zoom in lt). especially so if you
> > use ctrl-t to tag an image or when giving color labels it's easy to
> forget
> > that you have a big selection in the background.
> >
> > i don't have a strong opinion about it, but i thought the arguments above
> > were kind of convincing.
>
> Then *why* allow an all the selection of more than one image with a single
> image in view?
because you dont want to lose your selection just because you're taking
another close look.
> This seems *more* counter-intuitive than *not* performing
> an expected operation on all *selected* items, or is it limited only to
> exporting, which would be even more counter-intuitive? Isn't the
> selection process/action designed to limit actions to a *selection*? And
> in the same manner, I can limit view to four or ten images and having
> twenty selected, export all twenty instead of only those appearing in my
> view. Please consider returning to the previous behaviour.
>
you'll have to fight that out with the proponents of the current behaviour,
i don't care either way.
>
> ps: Expanding or contracting a group now is not a work-a-round to return
> from darkroom view to lightroom view and display the same image from
> darkroom view.
right. we should remove the grouping feature until that's fixed.
j.
> This is very disconcerting to one working in a large group
> of images and needing to perform an operation limited to lightroom view
> before returning to darkroom to continue working.
>
> Especially with stars being the only tagging feature present in both views
> (forgetting reject) and the ability to only view equal and greater number
> of stars instead of limiting view to equal number of stars.
>
> tks for your time and efforts,
> --
> (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711
> http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2
> http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member
> Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
> Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
> Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
> Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Darktable-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds.
Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
