Am Montag, 2. Dezember 2013 schrieb Pascal Obry: > Le 02/12/2013 22:17, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo a écrit : > > If you all are trying to shoot yourself on the foot and eventually loose > > all your processing to you different images is OK what you are > > proposing. Elsewhere you shoukd keep what darktable is proposing. > > I fully agree, I really find it strange to try hard to fight what dt is > offering and try to cripple it! dt has been designed to be a all-in-one > tool that can manipulate very large collection with multiple way of > selecting pictures from the whole set. Keeping only the darkroom part > seems quite a non sens to me :) > > But of course if this is the way it is working best for you. I just hope > that you are heading this way after having spent a good amount of time > looking at the dt's features!
+10 keeping your data save and sound is the most important. Having different cameras I use digikam for my JPGs and darktable for RAWs. Both are fine. So keep it as it is. Christian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
