On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:08:02 +0100 "Michael Below" <[email protected]> wrote:
> AFAIK Argyll and LittleCMS are different parts of > the color management system, not competitors. > Try enabling LittleCMS. I wonder, what each might be responsible for. In the meanwhile, I don't have a profile with swapped matrix anymore. Nevertheless I did this but couldn't notice any visual difference. Then, I saw, that among the modules the input/output profiles, and those definitively did make a difference, although I'm not yet sure if to better. My camera allows me to select one of two color spaces: sRGB and Adobe RGB. The current setting can be found also in Exif.Photo.ColorSpace. First I was wondering, why darktable doesn't use this information. But then I thought, as the images from the camera are raw+jpeg, darktable would use raw, and for that, the color space can be changed out of camera. Is this correct? Why would an input profile then make such a strongly visible difference keeping the output color space the same? Thanks, -- Cris ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154624111&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
