Am Dienstag, 23. Juni 2015, 23:22:35 schrieb [email protected]: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015, at 18:40, Robert William Hutton wrote: > > I personally treat my database as semi-disposable, but that probably comes > > from playing with development versions of darktable. > Does this mean that you don't create and use presets for the various > modules? This is what keeps me from treating the database as disposable, > since that's where they're stored. I know this has come up before, but has > there been any move away from this situation in darktable 2.0 development?
Not yet. It shouldn't bee too hard to move general data like presets and styles to its own database, however, some care has to be taken to find all places in the code that try to access those tables. If anyone feels fancy and wants to give it a try: ping me (houz) on IRC, there are several ways this could be done, some quick&dirty (I am not a fan of those) and others that are more work but should result in me being more happy. Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager! OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
_______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
