[Andy] > Dave, if you try to validate again, does it work now?
No, as of a minute ago. A couple of days ago I fixed one of them which was previously invalid, though, and it's now showing up as valid. Five others are not, but they were fixed yesterday or today. [Jonathan] > Thanks for the feedback! You're welcome. It's entirely selfish — I don't want my servers to be deleted from the registry. :) > I'll look into caching again on the validation Great, thanks Jonathan. I saw your subsequent email, too. > With regards to DSN being invalid when stated in the sources document I agree > it's a bit of a usability issue so I've now changed it so that the registry > will not complain about this and tolerate it both for 1.53E and 1.6E > specifications. Wonderful, thanks. > Putting DSN validation is on my todo list - but it's very little gain in my > opinion as it's simple and not got much to validate (as apposed to the > sources document) and is also completely super-seeded by the sources document. I agree, so I think as long as it's valid to state it in the sources document, that's enough. Dave _______________________________________________ DAS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das
