I haven't pushed any changes to the live servers as yet - so caching
will still be occurring.
On 1 Sep 2010, at 15:35, Dave Messina wrote:
[Andy]
Dave, if you try to validate again, does it work now?
No, as of a minute ago.
A couple of days ago I fixed one of them which was previously
invalid, though, and it's now showing up as valid. Five others are
not, but they were fixed yesterday or today.
[Jonathan]
Thanks for the feedback!
You're welcome. It's entirely selfish — I don't want my servers to
be deleted from the registry. :)
I'll look into caching again on the validation
Great, thanks Jonathan. I saw your subsequent email, too.
With regards to DSN being invalid when stated in the sources
document I agree it's a bit of a usability issue so I've now
changed it so that the registry will not complain about this and
tolerate it both for 1.53E and 1.6E specifications.
Wonderful, thanks.
Putting DSN validation is on my todo list - but it's very little
gain in my opinion as it's simple and not got much to validate (as
apposed to the sources document) and is also completely super-
seeded by the sources document.
I agree, so I think as long as it's valid to state it in the sources
document, that's enough.
Dave
Jonathan Warren
Senior Developer and DAS coordinator
blog: http://biodasman.wordpress.com/
[email protected]
Ext: 2314
Telephone: 01223 492314
--
The Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research
Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a
company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered
office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE.
_______________________________________________
DAS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das
