> A small question here at the end: what license should I apply to the > extension? I know that beagle is primarily MIT X11, but wouldn't the > MPL 2.0be a better license for this?
If there is any constraint e.g. you used some MPL code or Thunderbird requires extensions to be MPL, then use whatever is required. But otherwise, use the MIT license (as specified in the beagle GSoC page - http://beagle-project.org/Summer_Of_Code_2007 ). - dBera -- ----------------------------------------------------- Debajyoti Bera @ http://dtecht.blogspot.com beagle / KDE fan Mandriva / Inspiron-1100 user _______________________________________________ Dashboard-hackers mailing list Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers
