On Tue, 14 Jan 2003, Matthew Simon Cavalletto wrote: > On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 06:58 PM, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > > I question whether or not strftime (as used for Gregorian calendars) > > will be terribly useful for other calendars, since at least some > > portion of the specifiers won't translate. > > Agreed, strftime per se is Gregorian-centric. > > (Other calendars might also benefit from such a formatting capability, > but if we start adding and removing specifiers, it should probably be > called something other than strftime to avoid confusion.)
Ok, then what were you proposing moving out of (or not putting in) DateTime.pm in favor of putting it in a library. Or was that someone else instead? So many messages I'm losing track of who said what! -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
