On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:07:51AM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Tim Bunce wrote: > > > The ymd, mdy, and dmy methods all use two digit years. That's not > > ideal but I can understand people might like it. I'd strongly suggest > > that they be renamed yymmdd, mmddyy, ddmmyy, and the corresponding > > four digit year methods added as: yyyymmdd, mmddyyyy, ddmmyyyy. > > (Similary hms could be renamed hhmmss for consistency.) > > Um, no they don't.
Eh? Tim.
