On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:07:51AM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Tim Bunce wrote:
> >
> > > The ymd, mdy, and dmy methods all use two digit years. That's not
> > > ideal but I can understand people might like it. I'd strongly suggest
> > > that they be renamed yymmdd, mmddyy, ddmmyy, and the corresponding
> > > four digit year methods added as: yyyymmdd, mmddyyyy, ddmmyyyy.
> > > (Similary hms could be renamed hhmmss for consistency.)
> >
> > Um, no they don't.
>
> Eh?
They return 4 digit years. In fact, the only way to get a 2-digit year
right now is is $dt->strftime('%y').
-dave
/*=======================
House Absolute Consulting
www.houseabsolute.com
=======================*/
