On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > We are thinking about having two different modules. Or I'm willing to > throw mine away if it's just going to be superfluous. > > DateTime::Format::ISO8601::Complex > DateTime::Format::ISO8601::Simple > > The question is should there be a DT::Format::ISO8601 module? And if so > which module should it be. I'm more or less indifferent as which way to > go. Ben's module will cover much more of ISO8601 then mine.
I'm inclined to say completeness is more important than speed in this case. Optimizations can always be done later anyway. -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
