On Sat, 2 Aug 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > > > I take it back. I thought we'd have now() and hires_now(). I think > > > having nanosecond at 0 makes sense to most people. > > > > We have an awful lot of constructors already. Maybe we should put this into > > another package? > > The more I think about this the more I like it. We'll only have to > commit the fractional seconds fix to DateTime.pm. I'd suggest > DateTime::HiRes.pm to be included with the DT distribution. The down > side is this functionality wouldn't be available to decorators unless > DateTime::HiRes was a subclass of DT.
What would DateTime::HiRes offer besides a hires_now() method? -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
