Dave Rolsky wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Flavio S. Glock wrote: > > > Matt Sisk wrote: > > > > > > If a developer really had a need for handling infinite values, then this > > > wrapping could be explicitely disabled with a parameter in the constructor. > > > > > > > This was dismissed in a discussion here. > > Really, did I dismiss it? I can't remember. But Matt's suggestion seemed > reasonable. >
How about "detect_bounded => 1" for the current behaviour? The default would be 0. - Flavio S. Glock
