> Would DT::TZ::Observance have methods ->next and ->prev? Would make
> walking the chain easy. Raises questions of implementation strategy.
> There's a general question of whether to cache the observance objects,
> guarantee that the same ones are returned repeatedly, and so on.
>
> If we're going to go the heavyweight route, this is the way to go.
I would certainly vote for a next and previous call, though
I can easily work with what is proposed without it it makes sense
to me. But all I really need is a good way to get dst changes for
a specified year.
--
www.suave.net - Anthony Ball - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OSB - http://rivendell.suave.net/Beer
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"Bother," said Pooh, as millions of voices cried out and went silent.
