Zefram wrote > I'm principally interested in the general-case methods. I think we > ought to establish the general-case inteface first, and do the syntactic > sugar later. We have arbitrarily long to add more sugar methods to the > base class, but the underlying general methods form a contract between > independent bits of code, so other work depends on them.
Okay, fair enough. I'm thinking more in terms of methods that I would like to see as being callable from DT without directly using DT::TZ in the app code. (Similar to how I sub-classed DT to work with 4-5-4 calendar periods, see DT::F::Retail454). On a tangent (and I admit to not having researched this first), is there any way to get a list of all applicable transitions that a given TZ (or DT object in general) might have besides DST? Jim
