Diego Dompe wrote: > Hi Caglar, >
Hi, > Thanks for your time and effort on this one! > >> Due to the changes in header file locations lately in arm tree, all >> machine [...] >> After all these dplinkk module builds, but it is not working!!! >> However, I have >> another issue which might also cause this. I'll investigate this later. > > Well, I'm still sticking to the 2.6.26 tags on Git, since the 2.6.27 > tree changes are a bit disturbing in terms of header files as you found > out. However dpslink work for me (5.x). However there is a ugly point I > forgot: > - I decided to port the latest dsplink, but the codecservers available > on the dvsdk are for dsplink 4.x, so they don't run with the dsplink I > ported ;). > One problem after one another! [...] > Well, I have done the porting everything to the new kernel path before, > and I think doesn't worth it. It is better to rewrite the demos to work > with standard Linux APIs as much as possible and #ifdef where not > possible and keep them updated against the Git kernel. This way we will > force to have all the latest and greatest driver support at the Git > instead of the other trees. > You're totally right. Given that aSoc support is now working on git kernel, and if we can integrate new v4l2 drivers present on mv kernel to git kernel, git kernel may become more attractive. Regards, Caglar _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
