Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:46:31AM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote: >> Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: >>> We have been using the arago git tree and I don't see any of the issues >>> that you are seeing. Could you use arago tree and Let me know if you see >>> the same issue? This tree is being tested internally by TI. So it is known >>> to work. >>> >>> http://arago-project.org/git/people/sneha/linux-davinci-staging.git >> P.S. AFAIR, arago tree is based on 2.6.30-rc2. Eventually we have to >> test these patches with davinci tree. > > That's the confusion I was afraid of - the latest patches against 2.6.30 > final were tested in the "next" branch, while "master" stayed slightly old. > One of the reasons was to achieve feature-parity of the next branch before > making it the new master, which happened today. > > But, as I explained in the previous email, that still has v2 vpfe patches, > which I'll start rebasing tomorrow... >
Thanks for the heads up. This tree boots fine, without any issues. A minor problem is asoc code is not building without CONFIG_SND_DM6467_SOC_EVM=y. BTW, does this tree includes musb patches which was submitted to usb mailing list. but yet not included in mainline and davinci trees? Thanks, Caglar _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
