On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:09:12PM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote: > Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:46:31AM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote: > >> Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > >>> We have been using the arago git tree and I don't see any of the issues > >>> that you are seeing. Could you use arago tree and Let me know if you see > >>> the same issue? This tree is being tested internally by TI. So it is > >>> known > >>> to work. > >>> > >>> http://arago-project.org/git/people/sneha/linux-davinci-staging.git > >> P.S. AFAIR, arago tree is based on 2.6.30-rc2. Eventually we have to > >> test these patches with davinci tree. > > > > That's the confusion I was afraid of - the latest patches against 2.6.30 > > final were tested in the "next" branch, while "master" stayed slightly old. > > One of the reasons was to achieve feature-parity of the next branch before > > making it the new master, which happened today. > > > > But, as I explained in the previous email, that still has v2 vpfe patches, > > which I'll start rebasing tomorrow... > > Thanks for the heads up. This tree boots fine, without any issues. A > minor problem is asoc code is not building without > CONFIG_SND_DM6467_SOC_EVM=y.
Another heads up - the "next" branch is now rebased with vpfe v3 patches. > BTW, does this tree includes musb patches which was submitted to usb > mailing list. but yet not included in mainline and davinci trees? Can you please be more specific which musb patches you are referring to? Thanks. -- Denys _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
