> > Nice! > > I need anyway more explanations. > > I see you are talking about: > > http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-davinci.git > > and not: > > http://arago-project.org/git/projects/linux-davinci.git > > Correct. >
thx > As pointed out elsewhere, the arago tree is a TI development tree and > includes several things that are not ready for upstream or work in > progress etc. > ok > > > > So, the best thing for me should be to move exactly now to it for > > testing input video with adv7180 on dm365? > > Yes. > > > Maybe I spend more time at this moment, but if it is "the right > > thing" I will spend less time in the future rebasing my code from > > arago old tree. > > The "right" thing is to do your development and submit your patches as > close to mainline as possible. If you have dependencies on other > features that are not upstream, you might have to merge from arago, > but patches should always be submitted against mainline (or davinci > git, which track closely with mainline) > > Any out of tree dependencies should be stated in the patch changelog. > ok, I'm doing like that > > Kevin > > > Raffaele
_______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
