Hello.

thomas.koel...@baslerweb.com wrote:

From: Thomas Koeller <thomas.koel...@baslerweb.com>

The register base address for the second serial port (UART1) was
wrong.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Koeller <thomas.koel...@baslerweb.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c |    6 ++++++
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
index a146849..cf08950 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@
#define DM365_REF_FREQ 24000000 /* 24 MHz on the DM365 EVM */ +#undef DAVINCI_UART1_BASE /* Value in serial.h is wrong for DM365 */
+#define DAVINCI_UART1_BASE     (IO_PHYS + 0x106000)
+
 static struct pll_data pll1_data = {
        .num            = 1,
        .phys_base      = DAVINCI_PLL1_BASE,
@@ -1020,6 +1023,9 @@ static struct davinci_timer_info dm365_timer_info = {
        .clocksource_id = T0_TOP,
 };
+#undef DAVINCI_UART1_BASE /* Value in serial.h is wrong for DM365 */
+#define DAVINCI_UART1_BASE     (IO_PHYS + 0x106000)
+
 static struct plat_serial8250_port dm365_serial_platform_data[] = {
        {
                .mapbase        = DAVINCI_UART0_BASE,

   Why do it twice in the same file?!

WBR, Sergei
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to