hi Frans

thats not your unsmiling "So fare no reaction"
I did answer you, but you know it better and
wrote about all other.
Yout cry for 2.6.34 and would not try to help yourself.

> Which makes me wonder if the
> maintainer is gone to sleep/holiday or does it went unnoticed at all?

That is not OK, Better, you shut ypur mouth.

adda






Frans de Boer schrieb:
> Just asking, I have suggested a solution for the 2.6.34 problem with the
> 'kfree()' function. So fare no reaction. Which makes me wonder if the
> maintainer is gone to sleep/holiday or does it went unnoticed at all?
> My previous reaction lead to the rc2 version, so why not now a rc3 version?
> 
> Looking at the ([too?] rapid) pace of kernel development , I can
> understand that any maintainer would have trouble to cope with the
> kernel changes. on the other hand I see many 'deprecated' warnings in
> various sources which go unsolved until the (functional) support is
> really terminated.
> So, I just ask Linus to temporize the sometimes rapid changes and
> developers of software developers/maintainers to abide by the governing
> rules. Meaning, deprecated means just that. So, try to upgrade with the
> next release or the software.
> 
> Regards, Frans.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dazuko-help mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dazuko-help
> 


_______________________________________________
Dazuko-help mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dazuko-help

Reply via email to