Hi all, Well the message below - apparently from the maintainer - is clear. However, I suggest to first /read/ what I wrote before, then learn that I already helped myself *and* the community by suggesting an inclusion.
The statement that I know it better is probably based on the fact that his suggestion would lead to unreleased memory within the kernel and my inclusion restored the original release function kfree(). That I wrote to the list is a matter of etiquette when using a mail list. If transparency and open discussions are not appreciated, I suggest to abandon the list at all. So, I do not know what I did - or did not - to deserve such a harsh reaction. Yes, after this message I can understand it. Regards, Frans. On 05/30/2010 09:57 AM, Bernd Adda wrote: > hi Frans > > thats not your unsmiling "So fare no reaction" > I did answer you, but you know it better and > wrote about all other. > Yout cry for 2.6.34 and would not try to help yourself. > > >> Which makes me wonder if the >> maintainer is gone to sleep/holiday or does it went unnoticed at all? >> > That is not OK, Better, you shut ypur mouth. > > adda > > > > > > > Frans de Boer schrieb: > >> Just asking, I have suggested a solution for the 2.6.34 problem with the >> 'kfree()' function. So fare no reaction. Which makes me wonder if the >> maintainer is gone to sleep/holiday or does it went unnoticed at all? >> My previous reaction lead to the rc2 version, so why not now a rc3 version? >> >> Looking at the ([too?] rapid) pace of kernel development , I can >> understand that any maintainer would have trouble to cope with the >> kernel changes. on the other hand I see many 'deprecated' warnings in >> various sources which go unsolved until the (functional) support is >> really terminated. >> So, I just ask Linus to temporize the sometimes rapid changes and >> developers of software developers/maintainers to abide by the governing >> rules. Meaning, deprecated means just that. So, try to upgrade with the >> next release or the software. >> >> Regards, Frans. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dazuko-help mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dazuko-help >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Dazuko-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dazuko-help
