"Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now, with that out of the way, why does there have to be one maintainer? > We don't have one PostgreSQL server maintainer, and it seems crazy to > push all changes to DBD:pg through a single person. > > At PostgreSQL, we have a collaborative effort, where people post > patches, others comment, and when a consensus is reached, the patch is > applied. I plan to do very little with DBD-pg except to make sure > things are running smoothly within the group of DBD-pg developers, and I > will see they get any PostgreSQL information they need.
I agree. Thanks bruce, for jumping in and setting up the dbdpg project at gborg. jas.
