The current DBI v1 branch absolutely requires Perl 5.006000 but gives
a warning if it is not 5.006001, unless the user is on Darwin.
My question for today is whether you think it is reasonable for DBI
v2, which is already expected to break a few things, to simply
require 5.8.x at the outset, or perhaps specifically 5.008004
(whatever is stable at the time of v2 release).
Would a 5.8 requirement make the job of developing DBI itself and the
DBD drivers simpler, since there is less cruft for version-specific
bug workarounds?
Or alternately, would the impending Parrot make this matter
ultimately unimportant, and hence DBI v2 should just support 5.006001
as well?
Personally, I'm in favor of 5.8.x-only dependencies for DBI v2, and
those who insist in staying with older versions can keep DBI v1.
Any comments? Is raising the dependency level "arbitrarily" a bad
idea? Or is this exactly the right time to do it?
-- Darren Duncan
- Re: Minimum dependencies for DBI v2 Darren Duncan
- Re: Minimum dependencies for DBI v2 Tim Bunce
- Re: Minimum dependencies for DBI v2 H.Merijn Brand
- Re: Minimum dependencies for DBI v2 Darren Duncan
- Re: Minimum dependencies for DBI v2 Dean Arnold
- Re: Minimum dependencies for DBI v2 Darren Duncan
- Re: Minimum dependencies for DBI... Tim Bunce
- Re: Minimum dependencies for... Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: Minimum dependencies for... Tim Bunce
- Re: Minimum dependencies for... Jochen Wiedmann
- Re: Minimum dependencies for... David Wheeler
