On Thu 08 Jul 2004 19:47, Tim Bunce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 10:39:37AM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote: > > > > My question for today is whether you think it is reasonable for DBI > > v2, which is already expected to break a few things, to simply > > require 5.8.x at the outset, or perhaps specifically 5.008004 > > No. > > I'm happy for users to be told that some things, like Unicode, won't > work right without 5.8.x. But I'm not willing to leave 5.6.x users behind.
You won't be leaving them behind. They still have DBI-1.xx FWIW as per customer request, I am depending on 5.8.4 and up since two weeks. You can imagine that's a little bit earlier than I planned. And it's not UTF-8 that makes me need 5.8.4 > Tim. -- H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/) using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.0 & 633 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3, WinNT 4, Win2K pro & WinCE 2.11 often with Tk800.024 &/| DBD-Unify ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/perl/CPAN/authors/id/H/HM/HMBRAND/
