On 7/5/05, Dean Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> I'm already implementing [a message-passing async] wrapper for DBI
> (DBIx::Threaded); not a pragma, and very specific to DBIv1, but hopefully it 
> solves
> at least 85-90% of the problem. (tho async cancel/abort isn't
> solvable at this point)
> 
> BTW: the Pots::* modules already do what I *think* you're
> proposing (again, not as pragmas, and Perl5 based)
> 
> Dean

I'm going to forward you the Asynchronous pragma proposal off this list for your
consideration of the syntax.  Elizabeth Mattijsen liked it, for what
that's worth.

I don't see what the advantage of using the Pots modules is over directly using
Thread::queue  -- it doesn't appear to me to save any coding, although using
Pots modules would enforce some structure, which can be helpful.


-- 
David L Nicol

Reply via email to