On 7/5/05, Dean Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm already implementing [a message-passing async] wrapper for DBI > (DBIx::Threaded); not a pragma, and very specific to DBIv1, but hopefully it > solves > at least 85-90% of the problem. (tho async cancel/abort isn't > solvable at this point) > > BTW: the Pots::* modules already do what I *think* you're > proposing (again, not as pragmas, and Perl5 based) > > Dean
I'm going to forward you the Asynchronous pragma proposal off this list for your consideration of the syntax. Elizabeth Mattijsen liked it, for what that's worth. I don't see what the advantage of using the Pots modules is over directly using Thread::queue -- it doesn't appear to me to save any coding, although using Pots modules would enforce some structure, which can be helpful. -- David L Nicol