On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 08:41:27AM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > 2010/6/16 Tim Bunce <tim.bu...@pobox.com>: > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:10:38PM +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote: > >> Hi Tim, > >> > >> from my point of view, the current trunk of DBI is ready to be shipped > >> as next development release. > > > > Not in MANIFEST: t/51dbm_file.t > > Not in MANIFEST: t/52dbm_complex.t > > > > Should they be in the MANIFEST? > > They should, my fault. I'll do it now. > > > > Because it should be uploaded together with the development release of > > > SQL::Statement, we should synchronize our uploads. > > > > Please tell me more about this. Why synchronize? > > DBI has test-depends (and recommendation) for SQL::Statement 1.28 > and S::S has test-depends on DBI 1.612.
I think the DBI shouldn't have test-depends for SQL::Statement. The recommendation is fine though. > Some tests in DBI work only with SQL::Statement (and vice versa). Okay, but they're skipped if SQL::Statement isn't defined (right?) so the tests don't strictly *depend* on SQL::Statement. Tim.
