-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
> Looks like it should have been 2.6.0: Yep, there is no such thing as version 2.6 of DBD::Pg. > I think, the best way out would be a hard consensus and > CPAN reindex. Consensus on what exactly? Perhaps it would be good if the mixing of two and three dot versions on the same check was treated as a severe error and caused an automatic FAIL report. I can't see a case where using both forms would ever be desired. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane g...@turnstep.com End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/ PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201007081302 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkw2Bf4ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsitqACg/ci1wC6pC3KIsQ1EXctbhg57 /jcAnRrGkbzhvcoIZTZy6UlGdUN8uuDW =I0v4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
