On Jul 8, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Tim Bunce wrote: > My take on this, for the record, is to prefer two part numbers > in the form X.YYY where YYY never has a trailing zero.
And thus may be X.Y or X.YY as well. > Short, sweet, simple. Yeah, I'm with you. All of my modules use this format. (Except Bricolage. Don't ask.) > Tim. > > p.s. No one commented on the DBI going from 1.609 to 1.611 :) That's one louder, isn't it? David