On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 12:01:46 +0200, Jens Rehsack <rehs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Merijn, > > since Wendy told me yesterday that every new module must (should) > have a co-maint, It was decided upon to be *advisory* for upstream modules: those that have modules on CPAN that depend on it or where is known that DarkPAN users have publicly shown that they are using the module. The latter is not (yet) visible on any of the current CPAN clients. co-maint is not obligatory. certainly not for new modules. FWIW, I am in serious doubt if I want to have anyone co-maint Text::CSV_XS at all. > could I count on you for upcoming AnyData2 / DBD::AnyData2? /me is in serious doubt, as the main purpose of these modules is way out of my focus area: I never use them. Do you know of any CPAN author that is using them or has shown interest in these? That would IMHO be a better choice. > I don't want to start on dbi-dev@ a general discussion - so > AD2: yes or no? -- H.Merijn Brand http://tux.nl Perl Monger http://amsterdam.pm.org/ using perl5.00307 .. 5.21 porting perl5 on HP-UX, AIX, and openSUSE http://mirrors.develooper.com/hpux/ http://www.test-smoke.org/ http://qa.perl.org http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
pgphIhgijb7sh.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
