On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:49:15PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 09:19:03 -0500, David Nicol <davidn...@cpan.org> > wrote: > > > I look forward to being able to brag that DBIx::bind_param_inline is > > "Approved by the Berlin DBI Committee" or equivalent. > > As there is no, never was, nor will there be a "Berlin DBI Committee" > feel free to brag as you wish :P > > What *will* be published is a document with advisories on how module > authors are expected to behave once there modules are "hot". > > The document will have three levels of advice > > * New modules should do/have/follow/... > > * Modules that are heavily depended on should do/have/follow/... > > * Core- and toolchain modules should do/have/follow/... > > The document is there to serve a list of Best Practices and make the > module authors maintainers and co-maintainer be more aware of what > their changes might/will cause downriver.
And, hopefully, has no particular reference to the DBI beyond simply being an example of a heavily depdened on module, like many others. Tim.
