Jeffrey Seger schreef: > Dr.Ruud: >> JupiterHost.Net: >>>> Dr.Ruud: >>>>> Jeffrey Seger:
>>>>>> perl -MData::Dumper -e' print Dumper @INC' >>>>> >>>>> Alternative: >>>>> perl -MData::Dumper -e' print Data::Dumper->Dump([EMAIL PROTECTED], >>>>> [qw(*INC)])' >>> >>> Oi, why not much cleaner (code and output): >>> perl -MData::Dumper -e' print Dumper [EMAIL PROTECTED], \%INC;' >> >> ITYM: >> perl -MData::Dumper -e' print Data::Dumper->Dump([EMAIL PROTECTED],\%INC], >> [qw(*INC *INC)])' > > I think we can probably end this thread now. If I hadn't been so > tired....it was the middle of the night...I'd have just had him run > perl -V to get his @INC arrary. Cleaner than any of this. You are talking about 'cleaner' again, yet you top-post and you don't cut signatures and disclaimers (which shouldn't have been included in the first place, this is not such a private zone) and other 'old' text that you don't react upon. Using Data::Dumper is a good tool to know when debugging. There is no need to go for the VARn-output. -- Affijn, Ruud "Gewoon is een tijger."
